Beautiful. In a word.
Did I love it because of the subtle rock 'n' roll vibe? Probably
Did I love it because of the ghosts, ghouls and witch craft? Definitely
Did I love it because of the dark nature? Most definitely
Did I love Cas? Of course, who couldn't.
If ever there was a book written which I felt relatively close to, that wasn't a work of my own, it was this. Cas' dysfunctional relationships and distance from regular life plugs into how everyone feels at some point; Thomas and Carmel to the rescue. Yet he is cool, confident and genuine (most of the time!) Cas is a brilliant character with an aura which captivates and compels the reader.
As with any reader I dream up pictures of the characters in my mind and my imagined Cas is someone I would definitely love to meet, should there be a real person on whom he was based. Some say a strong, powerful and believable protagonist is what makes a book and in Kendare Blake's case I would agree.
I have missed the feeling novels such as Anna Dressed in Blood give me. My only hope is that a series of follow ups will not ruin the joy of the first, as has happened too much with novelists. After Harry Potter, everyone seemed to believe series' would win hearts and earn more money. Aside from the fact they were probably right, they were also very boring. The Morganville series is at the front of my mind when I write this, something which I was mildly interested in but lost faith in half way through book three. Along with the House of Night series which is now waning at books eight and nine. Or, perhaps I just got fed up of vampires and found roots in ghost stories!
Either way Blake conjures up a truly epic haunting tale spattered with blood, romance and friendship. Encasing a clash of the surreal with poetic tragedy this is a must!
Wednesday, 26 September 2012
Tuesday, 24 July 2012
The Dark Knight Rises
Before I begin here's a quick tip:
WATCH BATMAN BEGINS, then The Dark Knight and then go to the cinema and settle down for two hours of awesomeness.
If you saw this film and had not seen either of the first two, you are an idiot. If you saw this film having only seen The Dark Knight you will be disappointed and probably craving some Joker action (despite Heath Ledger's untimely death).
The Dark Knight Rises is darker, more heart pounding and ultimately more fierce than the previous two. Christopher Nolan can only be proud of this creation.
Before watching the film I was apprehensive of two aspects of the movie:
1, Anne Hathaway. My reaction to her casting was speechlessness. My reaction to her portrayal of Selina Kyle was much the same. Hathaway absolutely nailed it with this envisioning of the infamous jewelry thief and totally wiped any distant memory of her being a Princess Bride from my mind!
2, Bane's mask. I didn't feel his voice carried as much fear as it ought to. Having seen the film twice I still feel the same, however, Hardy's acting skills overpower any doubts circulating your mind.
Christian Bale delivers the knock out performance we expect of him now, Michael Caine pulled on all the emotions a stand-in father figure could and Morgan Freeman brings the party with his gadgets and humor. Joseph Gorden-Levitt absolutely soars during this film and adds the icing topping to a cake full of excellent acting skills and entertainment.
Costume is not always a topic discussed in reviews although if you have followed this blog you will see a brief mention in the quick review of Mirror Mirror. The costumes designs and the way in which they were worn only add to the immense success of this film. Especially Bane's mask and fur-lined coat combination.
It is hard to put into word exactly how much I loved this film and how it was evidently so well executed. This will be an excruciatingly hard film to follow especially if any other director wants to tackle Batman again in the future.
As with all films there are critics, to those who dislike this film or think they know ways in which to improve it I say this:
Let us see you make a film with such a cast and direct it this meticulously.
To the rest of you:
If you haven't seen this epic end to the Dark Knight's journey please do, I urge you to expand your horizons! If you have seen it, well you already know what I'm babbling about!
5 Massive golden stars! *****
WATCH BATMAN BEGINS, then The Dark Knight and then go to the cinema and settle down for two hours of awesomeness.
If you saw this film and had not seen either of the first two, you are an idiot. If you saw this film having only seen The Dark Knight you will be disappointed and probably craving some Joker action (despite Heath Ledger's untimely death).
The Dark Knight Rises is darker, more heart pounding and ultimately more fierce than the previous two. Christopher Nolan can only be proud of this creation.
Before watching the film I was apprehensive of two aspects of the movie:
1, Anne Hathaway. My reaction to her casting was speechlessness. My reaction to her portrayal of Selina Kyle was much the same. Hathaway absolutely nailed it with this envisioning of the infamous jewelry thief and totally wiped any distant memory of her being a Princess Bride from my mind!
2, Bane's mask. I didn't feel his voice carried as much fear as it ought to. Having seen the film twice I still feel the same, however, Hardy's acting skills overpower any doubts circulating your mind.
Christian Bale delivers the knock out performance we expect of him now, Michael Caine pulled on all the emotions a stand-in father figure could and Morgan Freeman brings the party with his gadgets and humor. Joseph Gorden-Levitt absolutely soars during this film and adds the icing topping to a cake full of excellent acting skills and entertainment.
Costume is not always a topic discussed in reviews although if you have followed this blog you will see a brief mention in the quick review of Mirror Mirror. The costumes designs and the way in which they were worn only add to the immense success of this film. Especially Bane's mask and fur-lined coat combination.
It is hard to put into word exactly how much I loved this film and how it was evidently so well executed. This will be an excruciatingly hard film to follow especially if any other director wants to tackle Batman again in the future.
As with all films there are critics, to those who dislike this film or think they know ways in which to improve it I say this:
Let us see you make a film with such a cast and direct it this meticulously.
To the rest of you:
If you haven't seen this epic end to the Dark Knight's journey please do, I urge you to expand your horizons! If you have seen it, well you already know what I'm babbling about!
5 Massive golden stars! *****
Thursday, 7 June 2012
Woman in Black: Film and Book review
On hearing about the new film due to be released starring Daniel Radcliffe I picked up the novel on which the film was based. By chance I found a copy sitting on a shelf in a local book store waiting to be devoured by hungry literary consumers. The cover immediately struck me and I knew I must buy and read the words written before they were brought alive by somebody else, somebody who didn't have the same vision within their heads as I would surely get from reading such a text.
Black crows, a full moon and the addition of the three words 'A Ghost Story' rather forcibly tell you what the book is about but the rest is left to the reader to find out on their journey to the back. The story starts in the present tense, although not in the present day. From there circumstances propel author Arthur Kipps to tell relay a story he has kept quiet for many years and so the tale of the Woman in Black begins. Between the twists and turns and the inevitable ghost story the novel portrays a families great tragedy brought on by another tragedy kept quiet from the rest of the world. Kipps uncovers a truth about a family lost to darkness long before he arrives at the destination filled with sad memories. The truth then haunts and pursues him until it forces darkness and loss onto him.
Directors always need to give some indication of their ability, their vision and their skill, adding a personal touch which can be enjoyed by viewers. With this story especially there is a clear gap between the written original and the motion picture. From the beginning it it clear the story has been altered to suit a different format as Kipps already has a son and evidence is brought forward to suggest his wife has already passed. He has already encountered the great loss which he does not know in the book until the end. My first question was then:
'What is this film about, if not loss and tragedy?'
The answer is fairly obvious after watching the movie start to finish. Turning pages ghouls, monsters and darkness do not leap out at you or surprise you. An author may successfully build tension and cause worry; shut the cover and it's over. The film was intended to scare it's audience, make them jump, bring alive the shock and horror the book could only speak of.
Unfortunately for the novel, most audiences prefer a happy ending and although this one is not full of joy and overcoming evil the ending is peaceful and a reunion occurs between Kipps and his late wife.
For Kipps on the screen, despite being reunited with his loved one which in turn signifies his death, it is a happy ending. He is in paradise. For Kipps on the page his curse lives on. Outliving both wife and son he is plagued by the memories of their deaths and also of the time he spent at Eel Marsh House.
These are two fascinating and thoroughly enthralling pieces of entertainment. The novel pulled on every emotion, particularly the scene with Spider, the dog, which does not occur in the film. (I was glad of this omission from the film as I found the scenes in I Am Legend and Tyrannosaur concerning pet dogs difficult).
Dreading I may sound cliche I did prefer the structure in the book, however, I believe this was the most successful transition from a book to the big screen I have had the pleasure of encountering. The film terrified me and had me sinking lower into my seat, retreating from the horror before me. I most definitely would have made the film differently, had I been a director, and I would of most certainly lost money for doing so!
Woman in Black book: 5 Stars *****
Woman in Black film: 5 Stars *****
Snow White and the Huntsman
Chris Hemsworth and Charlize Theron mixed with a dark twist on an old favourite and superb graphics is one cocktail of filmography brilliance no-one should pass up tasting. A dark army which shatters like glass, a golden mirror filled with mystery and tension, a paradise awash with sparkles, flowers and fairies and two particularly attractive leads to top it off. Aesthetically marvelous.
All of the above, I feel, was marred by the presence of Kristen Stewart. Snow White is famed for being blessed with enviable good looks, which in turn gives the Queen fuel to despise her unwanted step-daughter. However, Kristen Stewart bears no equality in beauty to the flawless Charlize Theron. Whilst I write this I think back to the Disney animation and I do believe the Queen far more appealing than Snow White in that instance as well. Therefore, perception of beauty plays a huge role in the new take on a classic tale.
Unfortunately, I cannot break free from the stiff, uncomfortable acting presented to me in Twilight. Stewart does not seemed to have improved between these films and while it may be a style she has adopted and some respond positively I was left feeling the part should have been cast to someone else (though I do not pretend to know who else may have fit the role or played it how I envisioned).
Snow White and the Huntsman was visual genius but lacking in areas constituted it uninspiring and unstimulating.
3.5 Stars ****
All of the above, I feel, was marred by the presence of Kristen Stewart. Snow White is famed for being blessed with enviable good looks, which in turn gives the Queen fuel to despise her unwanted step-daughter. However, Kristen Stewart bears no equality in beauty to the flawless Charlize Theron. Whilst I write this I think back to the Disney animation and I do believe the Queen far more appealing than Snow White in that instance as well. Therefore, perception of beauty plays a huge role in the new take on a classic tale.
Unfortunately, I cannot break free from the stiff, uncomfortable acting presented to me in Twilight. Stewart does not seemed to have improved between these films and while it may be a style she has adopted and some respond positively I was left feeling the part should have been cast to someone else (though I do not pretend to know who else may have fit the role or played it how I envisioned).
Snow White and the Huntsman was visual genius but lacking in areas constituted it uninspiring and unstimulating.
3.5 Stars ****
Friday, 4 May 2012
Just a quicky!
This is just a list of quick reviews I have seen fairly recently and decided to rate although I haven't gone into much detail!
We Bought a Zoo: based on the book by Benjamin Mee and starring Matt Damon and Scarlett Johansson this story is heart warming, hopeful and touching. A definite. 4 Stars ****
The Tournament: Action packed, exciting but it has been done before, starring Kelly Hu and Robert Carlisle. 3 Stars ***
Mr Poppers Penguins: Not at all what I expected, a witty family film with cute penguins! 4 Stars ****
MI4: Outrageous, completely surreal but with decent action scenes. Not the best. 2 Stars **
Lockout: An excellent part played by former This is England star Joseph Gilgun, the rest was average and had been done before. 3.5 Stars ****
Chronicle: A fresh idea with loads of potential and a kid that cried way to much. Almost. 2 Stars **
The Raven: Similar to the Johnny Depp film From Hell this was a brilliant collision of eloquent wording, a sharp dress sense and a serial killer. Astounding. 4.5 Stars ****
Contraband: Despite being a story line that's been done this was reinvented and with acting skills such as Mark Wahlberg, Giovanni Ribisi and Kate Beckinsale's to bring it to life this was a great hit! 4 Stars ****
Underworld Awakening: Everyone I've spoken to who is an Underworld fan liked this. For me there was just something missing. With a heavy heart I can only give this 3.5 Stars ****
Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists: From the makers of Wallace and Gromit this was always going to be good. There's something for everyone. 4 Stars ****
Mirror, Mirror: Despite anticipating Snow White and the Huntsman I was highly impressed by this film, it was funny, different and the costumes were beautifully designed. 4.5 Stars *****
Wrath of the Titans: Better than the first by a mile. Epic, strong and full of handsome men! 5 Stars *****
John Carter: Despite the major flop and millions it lost for Disney, this was Star Wars reinvented . Excellent 4 Stars ****
Fright Night: Not your average vampire movie and that is why it rocks! Filled with cheese layered between humor and sex appeal! 4 Stars ****
Project X: Feels as if you're at the party with them, a few quiet moments and it takes a while to get the party started. Average. 3.5 Stars ****
Safe House: Denzel Washington and Ryan Reynolds make for a rock solid team. The adverts give nothing away and you are plunged into two hours of mystery and action. 4 Stars ****
Journey 2 The Mysterious Island: An adventure everyone must embark upon, especially if you want to hear the Rock (Dwayne Johnson) sing! Out of this world. 4 Stars ****
Sherlock Holmes A Game of Shadows: Robert Downey Jr excels himself and pushes this character further into the tainted world of Moriarty. 4 Stars ****
Thor: Only brushes on the Avengers. I wish there were more scenes in Asgard which is beautifully envisioned and crafted. 3 Stars for Asgard ***
Captain America: Touching, heroic and a great set up to the Avengers. 4 Stars ****
The Grey: Liam Neeson graces the cinema screen again to bring us this under advertised gem. Honestly, I wish I had the time to do a full review this was a brutal and tense tale with a poem that will shake your soul. 5 Stars *****
In Time: A mind blowing concept and breath taking acting. 5 Stars *****
Warrior: Not only does this show off Tom Hardy's amazing body but the film is actually pretty good too! Not just for guys who like contact sport, I am a sport avoiding female and I loved it! 5 Stars *****
X-Men First Class: Michael Fassbender makes this film. Still only 3.5 Stars ****
Shame: A artistic film, only for those who have strong stomachs and don't mind lots of nudity. On the plus side Fassbender gets naked, always a bonus! This is dark and unsettling. 3 Stars ***
Coriolanus: Yet another Shakespearean hit turned into a modern day movie keeping the dialogue as it were. I found it difficult to understand yet it was moving, dark and treacherous. Ralph Fiennes and Gerrard Butler lend themselves well to the Shakespearean tongue, Fiennes especially who proves himself tenfold. 4 Stars ****
Intruders: An epic fail. Clive Owen is usually a hit or miss, this was an unfortunate miss. With the potential to do so well this film missed the mark by a long shot. Predictable, corny and not in the slightest bit scary. 1 Star *
Ghost Rider Spirit of Vengeance: Another film that failed to impress, taking the cringe worthy parts from the first film and instead of making them funny turning them into awful bits of acting and a horrible plot. Not recommended 1 Star *
The Awakening: Slightly over shadowed by the release of Dream House, nevertheless this was a good horror/thriller with an intriguing twist. 3 Stars ***
By all means don't take my word for it, watch them yourself and let your mind take you wherever it may. Look out for some joint book and film reviews including the highly anticipated Hunger Games!
Thanks for reading!
We Bought a Zoo: based on the book by Benjamin Mee and starring Matt Damon and Scarlett Johansson this story is heart warming, hopeful and touching. A definite. 4 Stars ****
The Tournament: Action packed, exciting but it has been done before, starring Kelly Hu and Robert Carlisle. 3 Stars ***
Mr Poppers Penguins: Not at all what I expected, a witty family film with cute penguins! 4 Stars ****
MI4: Outrageous, completely surreal but with decent action scenes. Not the best. 2 Stars **
Lockout: An excellent part played by former This is England star Joseph Gilgun, the rest was average and had been done before. 3.5 Stars ****
Chronicle: A fresh idea with loads of potential and a kid that cried way to much. Almost. 2 Stars **
The Raven: Similar to the Johnny Depp film From Hell this was a brilliant collision of eloquent wording, a sharp dress sense and a serial killer. Astounding. 4.5 Stars ****
Contraband: Despite being a story line that's been done this was reinvented and with acting skills such as Mark Wahlberg, Giovanni Ribisi and Kate Beckinsale's to bring it to life this was a great hit! 4 Stars ****
Underworld Awakening: Everyone I've spoken to who is an Underworld fan liked this. For me there was just something missing. With a heavy heart I can only give this 3.5 Stars ****
Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists: From the makers of Wallace and Gromit this was always going to be good. There's something for everyone. 4 Stars ****
Mirror, Mirror: Despite anticipating Snow White and the Huntsman I was highly impressed by this film, it was funny, different and the costumes were beautifully designed. 4.5 Stars *****
Wrath of the Titans: Better than the first by a mile. Epic, strong and full of handsome men! 5 Stars *****
John Carter: Despite the major flop and millions it lost for Disney, this was Star Wars reinvented . Excellent 4 Stars ****
Fright Night: Not your average vampire movie and that is why it rocks! Filled with cheese layered between humor and sex appeal! 4 Stars ****
Project X: Feels as if you're at the party with them, a few quiet moments and it takes a while to get the party started. Average. 3.5 Stars ****
Safe House: Denzel Washington and Ryan Reynolds make for a rock solid team. The adverts give nothing away and you are plunged into two hours of mystery and action. 4 Stars ****
Journey 2 The Mysterious Island: An adventure everyone must embark upon, especially if you want to hear the Rock (Dwayne Johnson) sing! Out of this world. 4 Stars ****
Sherlock Holmes A Game of Shadows: Robert Downey Jr excels himself and pushes this character further into the tainted world of Moriarty. 4 Stars ****
Thor: Only brushes on the Avengers. I wish there were more scenes in Asgard which is beautifully envisioned and crafted. 3 Stars for Asgard ***
Captain America: Touching, heroic and a great set up to the Avengers. 4 Stars ****
The Grey: Liam Neeson graces the cinema screen again to bring us this under advertised gem. Honestly, I wish I had the time to do a full review this was a brutal and tense tale with a poem that will shake your soul. 5 Stars *****
In Time: A mind blowing concept and breath taking acting. 5 Stars *****
Warrior: Not only does this show off Tom Hardy's amazing body but the film is actually pretty good too! Not just for guys who like contact sport, I am a sport avoiding female and I loved it! 5 Stars *****
X-Men First Class: Michael Fassbender makes this film. Still only 3.5 Stars ****
Shame: A artistic film, only for those who have strong stomachs and don't mind lots of nudity. On the plus side Fassbender gets naked, always a bonus! This is dark and unsettling. 3 Stars ***
Coriolanus: Yet another Shakespearean hit turned into a modern day movie keeping the dialogue as it were. I found it difficult to understand yet it was moving, dark and treacherous. Ralph Fiennes and Gerrard Butler lend themselves well to the Shakespearean tongue, Fiennes especially who proves himself tenfold. 4 Stars ****
Intruders: An epic fail. Clive Owen is usually a hit or miss, this was an unfortunate miss. With the potential to do so well this film missed the mark by a long shot. Predictable, corny and not in the slightest bit scary. 1 Star *
Ghost Rider Spirit of Vengeance: Another film that failed to impress, taking the cringe worthy parts from the first film and instead of making them funny turning them into awful bits of acting and a horrible plot. Not recommended 1 Star *
The Awakening: Slightly over shadowed by the release of Dream House, nevertheless this was a good horror/thriller with an intriguing twist. 3 Stars ***
By all means don't take my word for it, watch them yourself and let your mind take you wherever it may. Look out for some joint book and film reviews including the highly anticipated Hunger Games!
Thanks for reading!
American Pie: The Reunion
Stifler. That is all you really need. I realised this when speaking to friends who hadn't seen the film yet. I remembered Oz, due to his cute face and odd name. I remembered Jim who plays a key role and his wife Michelle. I also remembered Finch who famously bedded Stifler's mum. Then there was one more, what was his name. So frustrated was I that I couldn't remember I had to go on imdb.com and find out.
Kevin. He explains the lives of many in his one role. He was with a girl, she was his first love, they broke up, he moved on and got married, he goes to the reunion and meets his first love, they are still friends but he is faithful to his wife. Unfortunately this is the reality of real life. Oz gets famous and bags a model girlfriend but realises he is still in love with Heather, thankfully she feels the same. Finch lies about how awesome his life is, in truth it's just as boring but he ends up with a hot chick who used to be a geek. Then there's Jim who despite having a child and a lack of sexual contact which is overcome still makes it onto the remembered funny parts list. He and Michelle tackle real life issues and yet there is still comedy to be enjoyed.
Finally, Stifler, the one ingredient every friendship should have. He brings the memories, the laughs and the party spirit to this movie. At a crucial point in the plot they are looking over a wish list they made in their final year. Most of them are silly or time related issues, Stifler writes he wants to carry on the party with his boys. Yes he is irritating, obnoxious, crude and rude and loud but we love him for it. The best moment of the entire film is when he finally gets Finch back by sleeping with his mum. Jim's dad and Stifler's mum is another brilliant aspect of the plot and I really wanted Heather and Oz to get back together! Unfortunately Kevin and Vicky's story bored me. I didn't really care about them, they weren't funny like Jim, Michelle and Stifler, they were not soul mates like Heather and Oz and they weren't a rogue mother lover like Finch and so I conclude that I hate reality. I would rather live in a fantasy world or one where there is an eternal party! But wouldn't we all!
This film was good for a few laughs, realistic to some extent and reflected the original American Pie very well. It tied up loose ends and made room for perhaps another reunion or a new set of party loving virgins to take over. Either way watch it and see for yourself. But only the once.
3 Stars ***
Kevin. He explains the lives of many in his one role. He was with a girl, she was his first love, they broke up, he moved on and got married, he goes to the reunion and meets his first love, they are still friends but he is faithful to his wife. Unfortunately this is the reality of real life. Oz gets famous and bags a model girlfriend but realises he is still in love with Heather, thankfully she feels the same. Finch lies about how awesome his life is, in truth it's just as boring but he ends up with a hot chick who used to be a geek. Then there's Jim who despite having a child and a lack of sexual contact which is overcome still makes it onto the remembered funny parts list. He and Michelle tackle real life issues and yet there is still comedy to be enjoyed.
Finally, Stifler, the one ingredient every friendship should have. He brings the memories, the laughs and the party spirit to this movie. At a crucial point in the plot they are looking over a wish list they made in their final year. Most of them are silly or time related issues, Stifler writes he wants to carry on the party with his boys. Yes he is irritating, obnoxious, crude and rude and loud but we love him for it. The best moment of the entire film is when he finally gets Finch back by sleeping with his mum. Jim's dad and Stifler's mum is another brilliant aspect of the plot and I really wanted Heather and Oz to get back together! Unfortunately Kevin and Vicky's story bored me. I didn't really care about them, they weren't funny like Jim, Michelle and Stifler, they were not soul mates like Heather and Oz and they weren't a rogue mother lover like Finch and so I conclude that I hate reality. I would rather live in a fantasy world or one where there is an eternal party! But wouldn't we all!
This film was good for a few laughs, realistic to some extent and reflected the original American Pie very well. It tied up loose ends and made room for perhaps another reunion or a new set of party loving virgins to take over. Either way watch it and see for yourself. But only the once.
3 Stars ***
Cabin In the Woods
If you enter the cinema with a horror movie in mind, you are wrong. If you have ben told there is an almighty twist and you would never see it coming, the person who told you is blind. If you've been told it's cheesy, rubbish and a waste of money, only half of this is true.
Cabin in the Woods is unique, it is cheesy (in a good way) and if you open your mind to what Joss Whedon and his team achieved you may love it. I am fully aware it isn't everyones cup of tea but I implore you to find out for yourself and drop all previous thoughts of what it might be or how it may end.
Firstly the horror movie. Yes there are elements of horror in this film, some would say they are collected from a selection of the greatest horror movies known, and put together in a very clever way. I was impressed by the stereotypical choices for America and Japan (you will understand once you've seen it!). Secondly the almighty twist. What a load of b***s***. Right from the opening credits there are clues as to what is going on. Then as soon as they arrive there are more clues, these clues mount up and up. Some may argue, yes there are clues but it could be argued that (close you eyes now if you do not want this twist spoilt) they are just being killed for a snuff movie or there is a hostel-like element and people are paying to see them frightened. I agree this could be argued, unless you open your eyes and truly watch the movie, every time someone dies blood in poured into statue outlines, one of the two men controlling the dome kisses a necklace and prays about half way through the film. No it is not altogether obvious how it will end but if you pay attention you will definitely have an idea where it is going. Thirdly the amount of cheese and the waste of money. The cheesy element to this film makes it funny, this is definitely a black comedy by all accounts. If you feel you have wasted your money, then you have solely because you have not appreciated this display of imagination nor have you fully committed to enjoying the film.
If you want to watch a scary movie pull out a copy of Insidious, if you want to see something shocking go and find an asian horror called Audition but if you want to see a black comedy don't reach for The Cottage, no put that down. Watch Cabin in the Woods, it is a reinvention of Cabin Fever
(which I loved for one conversation:
Bert: I'm gonna go shoot some squirrels
Paul: Why would you wanna shoot squirrels
Bert: 'cause they're gay)
Less about that though, this movie is also packed with remarkably funny one liners and witty comments, such as "He has a husbands bulge" which in context will make you howl. It wasn't awesome, it was a hell of a lot better than people made out, therefore it was good and worth watching at least once to encounter Joss Whedon's mind.
4 Stars (for sheer genius and originality) ****
Cabin in the Woods is unique, it is cheesy (in a good way) and if you open your mind to what Joss Whedon and his team achieved you may love it. I am fully aware it isn't everyones cup of tea but I implore you to find out for yourself and drop all previous thoughts of what it might be or how it may end.
Firstly the horror movie. Yes there are elements of horror in this film, some would say they are collected from a selection of the greatest horror movies known, and put together in a very clever way. I was impressed by the stereotypical choices for America and Japan (you will understand once you've seen it!). Secondly the almighty twist. What a load of b***s***. Right from the opening credits there are clues as to what is going on. Then as soon as they arrive there are more clues, these clues mount up and up. Some may argue, yes there are clues but it could be argued that (close you eyes now if you do not want this twist spoilt) they are just being killed for a snuff movie or there is a hostel-like element and people are paying to see them frightened. I agree this could be argued, unless you open your eyes and truly watch the movie, every time someone dies blood in poured into statue outlines, one of the two men controlling the dome kisses a necklace and prays about half way through the film. No it is not altogether obvious how it will end but if you pay attention you will definitely have an idea where it is going. Thirdly the amount of cheese and the waste of money. The cheesy element to this film makes it funny, this is definitely a black comedy by all accounts. If you feel you have wasted your money, then you have solely because you have not appreciated this display of imagination nor have you fully committed to enjoying the film.
If you want to watch a scary movie pull out a copy of Insidious, if you want to see something shocking go and find an asian horror called Audition but if you want to see a black comedy don't reach for The Cottage, no put that down. Watch Cabin in the Woods, it is a reinvention of Cabin Fever
(which I loved for one conversation:
Bert: I'm gonna go shoot some squirrels
Paul: Why would you wanna shoot squirrels
Bert: 'cause they're gay)
Less about that though, this movie is also packed with remarkably funny one liners and witty comments, such as "He has a husbands bulge" which in context will make you howl. It wasn't awesome, it was a hell of a lot better than people made out, therefore it was good and worth watching at least once to encounter Joss Whedon's mind.
4 Stars (for sheer genius and originality) ****
Avengers Assemble vs. Battleship
These two explosively action packed movies both blew me away. In a collaboration of 'Transformers meets Battle L.A, in the sea' as my partner so rightly put it, Battleship was both out of this world and believable. On the other hand Avengers was everything it had promised to be, witty, powerful and immensely fun to watch.
When I first saw adverts for Battleship I was unsure about how it may pan out and whether or not I would enjoy the two hours I was about to endure. Luckily I loved it. Recently there have been too many movies where as soon as the bad guys start winning or as soon as a large brilliantly computerized monster appears they are shot down immediately and the film lacks a good fight scene and wastes the talents of such computer geek. (For example in Soloman Kane).
Battleship and Avengers Assemble both throw this growing pain out the window and opt for epic fight scenes and returning danger. In Battleship we see the crew celebrating a victory when the largest of the invading ships suddenly crashes the party by arming itself when they only have one torpedo remaining and must make it count. In Avengers Assemble shows a huge metal snake-like beast appearing from a portal in the sky, this is quickly apprehended and I cringed until Loki (Tom Hiddleston) heard my prayers and requests his minions send the rest, at which point as you can guess lots more huge metal snake-like beasts appear!
Whilst watching Battleship I was also apprehensive of singer turned actress Rihanna. I was worried she would be very cliche and ruin the female role, however, quite surprisingly to me she was great! I feel now that perhaps I followed the crowd on this decision and assumed she would be awful despite her appearance in many videos for her songs lending her the acting experience she required.
Obviously I was outraged, being a huge fan, that Alexander Skarsgard didn't have a lengthy appearance. This was leveled by the appearance of Taylor Kitsch (John Carter). His role in this movie was priceless and so far from that of John Carter it really showed off his acting talent. Another amazing casting choice was none other than Liam Neeson, who makes any film awesome really and I would have loved to have seen more of him but that was not to be for his character. Lastly, Lieutenant Colonel Mick Canales or Gregory D.Gadson for short, played a stereotypical hero whose lost his mojo role. This has been viewed as cheesey by many but I thought the part was fitting and his cliche comments were made fun of by a science geek.
Avengers also has a cast to rival Battleship with outstanding actors such as Robert Downey Jr, Samuel L. Jackson, Chris Evans, Chris Hemsworth and Stellen Skarsgard. As you may have noticed I do not mention Scarlett Johansson here, this is mainly for the idea that she was supposed to have been Russian at some point, which was not a believable part of the plot. One of the biggest surprises for me was Mark Ruffalo or the Hulk. I have only seen the original televised series of the Hulk and the film starring Eric Bana. As a child I enjoyed the T.V series but now it has aged and technology has advanced. I have never been Eric Bana's biggest fan and disliked the movie he was in, therefore I didn't watch the 2008 remake which also starred an actor of which I am not fond, Edward Norton. Mark Ruffalo has restored my love of this particular marvel character. His performance was incredible (pardon the pun).
Now, a battle of which film starred the most 'hotties'. On the one hand you have Kitsch, Skarsgard, Neeson and Rihanna and on the other you have Downey Jr, Evans, Hemsworth, Renner, Ruffalo and Johansson. Avengers is a clear winner. As for alien race I think both were excellent but if you were one of the cinema goers who stayed behind after the credits you will recall the last scene, for me the face of the assailant leading the alien race was a deal breaker. Due to the human like nature of the aliens in Battleship (which is highly believable knowing that they have come from a similar planet to Earth) it becomes one all in the battle for best film.
For sheer enjoyment and action scenes I will definitely be awarding a point to each, they were equally thrilling and both had me hooked from the beginning. For actual acting skills again both were equal in my view. The story lines were similar, alien creatures threaten Earth, band of selected few fight them and inevitably win. Therefore for story line they are also equal. Finally I feel Battleship was more believable than Avengers especially when it came to Captain America's previous preservation in an ice chamber. However, knowing that these characters started out as comics and have been developed I have to overlook this minor detail. As stand alone films they will both stay in your memory and hopefully become all time greats in years to come. To compare them is a difficult task and both threw in surprises along the way. In the end, although it pains me as I would love to see an overall winner, I will have to agree with my brain that these films were on par. I thought by writing out the good and bad points I would deduct a clear winner, I have failed to do so and will give them both what they deserve.
Avengers: ***** Battleship: *****
When I first saw adverts for Battleship I was unsure about how it may pan out and whether or not I would enjoy the two hours I was about to endure. Luckily I loved it. Recently there have been too many movies where as soon as the bad guys start winning or as soon as a large brilliantly computerized monster appears they are shot down immediately and the film lacks a good fight scene and wastes the talents of such computer geek. (For example in Soloman Kane).
Battleship and Avengers Assemble both throw this growing pain out the window and opt for epic fight scenes and returning danger. In Battleship we see the crew celebrating a victory when the largest of the invading ships suddenly crashes the party by arming itself when they only have one torpedo remaining and must make it count. In Avengers Assemble shows a huge metal snake-like beast appearing from a portal in the sky, this is quickly apprehended and I cringed until Loki (Tom Hiddleston) heard my prayers and requests his minions send the rest, at which point as you can guess lots more huge metal snake-like beasts appear!
Whilst watching Battleship I was also apprehensive of singer turned actress Rihanna. I was worried she would be very cliche and ruin the female role, however, quite surprisingly to me she was great! I feel now that perhaps I followed the crowd on this decision and assumed she would be awful despite her appearance in many videos for her songs lending her the acting experience she required.
Obviously I was outraged, being a huge fan, that Alexander Skarsgard didn't have a lengthy appearance. This was leveled by the appearance of Taylor Kitsch (John Carter). His role in this movie was priceless and so far from that of John Carter it really showed off his acting talent. Another amazing casting choice was none other than Liam Neeson, who makes any film awesome really and I would have loved to have seen more of him but that was not to be for his character. Lastly, Lieutenant Colonel Mick Canales or Gregory D.Gadson for short, played a stereotypical hero whose lost his mojo role. This has been viewed as cheesey by many but I thought the part was fitting and his cliche comments were made fun of by a science geek.
Avengers also has a cast to rival Battleship with outstanding actors such as Robert Downey Jr, Samuel L. Jackson, Chris Evans, Chris Hemsworth and Stellen Skarsgard. As you may have noticed I do not mention Scarlett Johansson here, this is mainly for the idea that she was supposed to have been Russian at some point, which was not a believable part of the plot. One of the biggest surprises for me was Mark Ruffalo or the Hulk. I have only seen the original televised series of the Hulk and the film starring Eric Bana. As a child I enjoyed the T.V series but now it has aged and technology has advanced. I have never been Eric Bana's biggest fan and disliked the movie he was in, therefore I didn't watch the 2008 remake which also starred an actor of which I am not fond, Edward Norton. Mark Ruffalo has restored my love of this particular marvel character. His performance was incredible (pardon the pun).
Now, a battle of which film starred the most 'hotties'. On the one hand you have Kitsch, Skarsgard, Neeson and Rihanna and on the other you have Downey Jr, Evans, Hemsworth, Renner, Ruffalo and Johansson. Avengers is a clear winner. As for alien race I think both were excellent but if you were one of the cinema goers who stayed behind after the credits you will recall the last scene, for me the face of the assailant leading the alien race was a deal breaker. Due to the human like nature of the aliens in Battleship (which is highly believable knowing that they have come from a similar planet to Earth) it becomes one all in the battle for best film.
For sheer enjoyment and action scenes I will definitely be awarding a point to each, they were equally thrilling and both had me hooked from the beginning. For actual acting skills again both were equal in my view. The story lines were similar, alien creatures threaten Earth, band of selected few fight them and inevitably win. Therefore for story line they are also equal. Finally I feel Battleship was more believable than Avengers especially when it came to Captain America's previous preservation in an ice chamber. However, knowing that these characters started out as comics and have been developed I have to overlook this minor detail. As stand alone films they will both stay in your memory and hopefully become all time greats in years to come. To compare them is a difficult task and both threw in surprises along the way. In the end, although it pains me as I would love to see an overall winner, I will have to agree with my brain that these films were on par. I thought by writing out the good and bad points I would deduct a clear winner, I have failed to do so and will give them both what they deserve.
Avengers: ***** Battleship: *****
Saturday, 28 January 2012
Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children by Ransom Riggs
Plunging into a world of mystery, adventure and curious events this story is most definitely true to it's title- peculiar. In many instances when I pick up a book I read the blurb in order to grasp the feel of the book and more importantly help my brain to decide if this is one for me. With this one, as with a select few others, I made a conscious decision not to let myself in on the story. I feel that in some cases the cover alone is enough to alert my full attention that my eyes must scan these pages and discover another world hidden within.
And so, I opened the book with no real expectations and jumped right in. Normally I would not read the prologue but after a quick scan I deduced it was imperative to the story, which I am fairly certain others are as well. Unfortunately I become greedy and turn the pages in search of the answers to fill my blank spaces. With this title I held back my unfathomable urge to devour the book pages, spine and sleeve and took my time to understand and enjoy reading. Too often have I had to re-read novels because I missed things the first time round.
I found, from the start, that I was hooked. The writing along with the images shown were just the trick to get my senses tingling. The writing style is a pleasure to digest, smooth enough to follow and flavoured enough to with hold that initial interest. This combined with the ingenious plot make for a brilliant read. Just as all books of this nature should be the suspense was held for as long as Riggs could stretch it before revealing small droplets of truth behind the mysteries.
I cared not only for the main character, Jacob, but also for his father and grandfather. I found it easy to sympathise with each despite my own gender. Some ideas in this novel may not be original but the way in which they are portrayed and expressed is extremely unique and sophisticated. I am, admittedly, a fan of historical themes in books. I prefer fantasy and do not much care for accounts of a real world gone by but love to indulge in reading of those times with a sprinkling of fairy dust and an ounce of magic.
The images strewn throughout the book only add to the riddle of it's undoing. An uneasy, 'distant memory' type feeling is unearthed from the eerie photographs. These images were right up my street, aiding my engulfment into a foreign world in the head of someone I have never met. Escapism may be a cliche when talking about books, nonetheless it's how I feel and is a feeling I am keen to embrace again soon.
Riggs finds a way of exposing the mystery and yet manages to keep the peculiar nature of people, time and places. He does not pepper the enemies with flowers and view them through rose tinted spectacles instead he places fear into the readers and allows our vivid imaginations to run rampant with chaotic ideas.
As may be obvious to you I am a great fan of this novel and cannot hope harder for a follow up. Without a doubt it has made the jump to the top of my favourites pile! An excellent choice for a first book review!
***** 5 Stars
And so, I opened the book with no real expectations and jumped right in. Normally I would not read the prologue but after a quick scan I deduced it was imperative to the story, which I am fairly certain others are as well. Unfortunately I become greedy and turn the pages in search of the answers to fill my blank spaces. With this title I held back my unfathomable urge to devour the book pages, spine and sleeve and took my time to understand and enjoy reading. Too often have I had to re-read novels because I missed things the first time round.
I found, from the start, that I was hooked. The writing along with the images shown were just the trick to get my senses tingling. The writing style is a pleasure to digest, smooth enough to follow and flavoured enough to with hold that initial interest. This combined with the ingenious plot make for a brilliant read. Just as all books of this nature should be the suspense was held for as long as Riggs could stretch it before revealing small droplets of truth behind the mysteries.
I cared not only for the main character, Jacob, but also for his father and grandfather. I found it easy to sympathise with each despite my own gender. Some ideas in this novel may not be original but the way in which they are portrayed and expressed is extremely unique and sophisticated. I am, admittedly, a fan of historical themes in books. I prefer fantasy and do not much care for accounts of a real world gone by but love to indulge in reading of those times with a sprinkling of fairy dust and an ounce of magic.
The images strewn throughout the book only add to the riddle of it's undoing. An uneasy, 'distant memory' type feeling is unearthed from the eerie photographs. These images were right up my street, aiding my engulfment into a foreign world in the head of someone I have never met. Escapism may be a cliche when talking about books, nonetheless it's how I feel and is a feeling I am keen to embrace again soon.
Riggs finds a way of exposing the mystery and yet manages to keep the peculiar nature of people, time and places. He does not pepper the enemies with flowers and view them through rose tinted spectacles instead he places fear into the readers and allows our vivid imaginations to run rampant with chaotic ideas.
As may be obvious to you I am a great fan of this novel and cannot hope harder for a follow up. Without a doubt it has made the jump to the top of my favourites pile! An excellent choice for a first book review!
***** 5 Stars
Tuesday, 24 January 2012
Goon
I heard many views on this film, some that deem it stupid and brutal. Although people say this in a negative way I believe the opposite. It is outrageously laugh out loud funny, there is an element of stupidity which only benefits the characters and the humor of the film. It is also violent and bloody. I am not a fan of watching fights be it boxing, brawling or UFC but I absolutely loved this film.
Sean William Scott plays his main character Doug very well, although Doug is similar to many of his previous roles it was still a sterling performance! Alison Pill who plays horny, slut and love of Doug's life Eva reminded me of Ellen Page. Her acting style seems to have become popular in recent years and adopted by many others. Jay Baruchel also gives a horny, teenage boy performance as Doug's strange best friend. Another actor blessed with brilliant skills is Liev Schreiber who plays Doug's hero and nemesis Ross Rhea. He was born for this part and like William Scott is great at playing a certain character. For William Scott it's lovable but stupid party animal, for Schreiber it's brutal, slightly crazy warrior.
Based on a true story, Goon shows the journey of a Jewish man who feels fit only to bounce become a somebody, find his vocation, and meet the girl of his dreams. In the meantime he has numerous fights and becomes the glue to his new adopted family- his team. I am now eagerly awaiting American Pie: The Reunion with a renewed love of Stifler and have a little more insight and knowledge about the world of ice hockey. This film needed no moral, and no reason for being produced other than to be a highly entertaining, heart warming tale.
***** 4.5 Stars
Sean William Scott plays his main character Doug very well, although Doug is similar to many of his previous roles it was still a sterling performance! Alison Pill who plays horny, slut and love of Doug's life Eva reminded me of Ellen Page. Her acting style seems to have become popular in recent years and adopted by many others. Jay Baruchel also gives a horny, teenage boy performance as Doug's strange best friend. Another actor blessed with brilliant skills is Liev Schreiber who plays Doug's hero and nemesis Ross Rhea. He was born for this part and like William Scott is great at playing a certain character. For William Scott it's lovable but stupid party animal, for Schreiber it's brutal, slightly crazy warrior.
Based on a true story, Goon shows the journey of a Jewish man who feels fit only to bounce become a somebody, find his vocation, and meet the girl of his dreams. In the meantime he has numerous fights and becomes the glue to his new adopted family- his team. I am now eagerly awaiting American Pie: The Reunion with a renewed love of Stifler and have a little more insight and knowledge about the world of ice hockey. This film needed no moral, and no reason for being produced other than to be a highly entertaining, heart warming tale.
***** 4.5 Stars
Dream House
I felt this film could go one of two ways. Either it would be epic, old-school and challenging, or it would be predictable, a little lackluster and not worth a second viewing.
The idea was incredibly clever, although not particularly original. There were some similarities to the epic Shutter Island although during the film I failed to place these familiarities. Unfortunately, whether due to the previous production of Shutter Island and other such films Dream House missed the mark slightly.
I felt comfortable viewing this film for the first time and yet inside my head I decided early on not to bother buying the production on DVD nor attempting to watch it again. It becomes clear some time before the end how the story will be tied up and without spoiling the story line it becomes quickly obvious whodunnit!
I am not a big fan of Daniel Craig as an actor but I believed Rachel Weisz would bring something special to the production. Although her acting skills were up to standard I think the story line itself left little to experiment with. (But what do I know, I'm not an actress!). Having seen a trailer for the new Clive Owen film, Intruders, I am eager to see how the two films differ. I believe they are a similar idea and as a fan of Clive Owen I hope I enjoy this next thriller more so!
I would ask you, as always, to make up your own mind and not take my word as gospel. However, I wouldn't pay to see it again and don't think you should waste good money on this one!
*** 3 Stars
The idea was incredibly clever, although not particularly original. There were some similarities to the epic Shutter Island although during the film I failed to place these familiarities. Unfortunately, whether due to the previous production of Shutter Island and other such films Dream House missed the mark slightly.
I felt comfortable viewing this film for the first time and yet inside my head I decided early on not to bother buying the production on DVD nor attempting to watch it again. It becomes clear some time before the end how the story will be tied up and without spoiling the story line it becomes quickly obvious whodunnit!
I am not a big fan of Daniel Craig as an actor but I believed Rachel Weisz would bring something special to the production. Although her acting skills were up to standard I think the story line itself left little to experiment with. (But what do I know, I'm not an actress!). Having seen a trailer for the new Clive Owen film, Intruders, I am eager to see how the two films differ. I believe they are a similar idea and as a fan of Clive Owen I hope I enjoy this next thriller more so!
I would ask you, as always, to make up your own mind and not take my word as gospel. However, I wouldn't pay to see it again and don't think you should waste good money on this one!
*** 3 Stars
Immortals
Before I go into any finer details of this film I must state that Immortals was how Clash of the Titans SHOULD have been. Immortals has quickly become my favourite film of 2011. A brilliant, striking and tense motion picture that should be a classic in years to come and a part of every film buff's blu-ray collection!
Micky Rourke is definitely the right man for the character of King Hyperion. He plays the greedy, driven and thoroughly evil man with the correct amount of reality. Part of me would have loved to have lived in this era. To have been alive during the reign of the Gods and to have been aside so many buff, scantily clad stud muffins, I do think I would have fitted in well!
Henry Cavill, a rather new addition to the 'world's sexiest male' award, plays Theseus who would definitely get my vote! Although I hate to sounds cliche Cavill plays a believable hero and trustworthy leader. Alongside lovable rogue Stavros (Stephen Dorff) the two make one of the most mouth watering, eye-candy duos yet!
Moving away from the sex-appeal and my personal interest in the actors this film was just what I needed after the disappointment of Straw Dogs a week earlier. I was mightily impressed with the way the Gods were portrayed, filmed and adorned. Next to the puny humans the Gods looked, well, Godly! Everything about them oozed power and intellect. I particularly enjoyed watching the fight scene between the Gods and the Titans. The slow motion of the Gods and fast pace of the Titans was enough for an epic battle to take place.
Had the entire movie been shot this way it wouldn't have been as epic in its moment. The film needed to normal pace of the human race to counter act this. Theseus being a half God some of his movements were also in slow motion, which captured his strength and ability. Sewn together all the bits of this movie made for an amazing 3D film.
If I have to be picky the only area I could have seen for improvement was Mount Olympus. I would have liked to have seen more of it and in more detail, depicting clearly and boldly where the Gods resided. As the only negative I believe this proves what an awesome few hours I had when watching this film. I recommend to all, especially if you have a fetish for Greek mythology like me!
***** 5 Stars (and I'd give it more if I could!)
Micky Rourke is definitely the right man for the character of King Hyperion. He plays the greedy, driven and thoroughly evil man with the correct amount of reality. Part of me would have loved to have lived in this era. To have been alive during the reign of the Gods and to have been aside so many buff, scantily clad stud muffins, I do think I would have fitted in well!
Henry Cavill, a rather new addition to the 'world's sexiest male' award, plays Theseus who would definitely get my vote! Although I hate to sounds cliche Cavill plays a believable hero and trustworthy leader. Alongside lovable rogue Stavros (Stephen Dorff) the two make one of the most mouth watering, eye-candy duos yet!
Moving away from the sex-appeal and my personal interest in the actors this film was just what I needed after the disappointment of Straw Dogs a week earlier. I was mightily impressed with the way the Gods were portrayed, filmed and adorned. Next to the puny humans the Gods looked, well, Godly! Everything about them oozed power and intellect. I particularly enjoyed watching the fight scene between the Gods and the Titans. The slow motion of the Gods and fast pace of the Titans was enough for an epic battle to take place.
Had the entire movie been shot this way it wouldn't have been as epic in its moment. The film needed to normal pace of the human race to counter act this. Theseus being a half God some of his movements were also in slow motion, which captured his strength and ability. Sewn together all the bits of this movie made for an amazing 3D film.
If I have to be picky the only area I could have seen for improvement was Mount Olympus. I would have liked to have seen more of it and in more detail, depicting clearly and boldly where the Gods resided. As the only negative I believe this proves what an awesome few hours I had when watching this film. I recommend to all, especially if you have a fetish for Greek mythology like me!
***** 5 Stars (and I'd give it more if I could!)
We Need To talk About Kevin
My partner and I decided to watch this film in a spur of the moment decision. Initially we had wanted to watch the Texas Killing Fields, unfortunately it was not showing. All I knew about this film was the title and that Tilda Swinton and John C. Reily were the starring roles. Due to the nature of Reily's past films I was under the impression I was going to see an awkward comedy. It became quickly evident I was wrong but the story which unfolded on the screen before me was not a disappointment. This seriously creepy and brilliantly artistic portrayal of a mother's unconditional love will capture you from the start and push you out of your comfort zone.
Tilda Swinton's skeletal figure fits the role of worried mother Eva, who is plagued by the actions of her son. Although you do not find out until the end exactly what has happened you are shown glimpses of the past from Eva's broken memory. In the present Eva is very much alone, isolated and vulnerable.
The plot gets quickly dark as she is struggling to find a job, when, finally she is excepted somewhere her momentary happiness is interrupted by a stranger who attacks her. A man tries to help by offering to ring the police after the unprovoked attack but Eva insists it was her own fault. It was clear to me sitting in my comfortable cinema seat something terrible had taken place and she was at the centre of it all. It occurred to me then, why hasn't she left? If something so terrible had happened where she lived and there were obviously bad memories why did she stay? My question was answered quite a bit later in the film after her memories began to form a more complete story.
She had met Franklin (John C. Reily) and fallen in love, the two had married and soon she became pregnant. Despite Franklin being happy about the unborn child, Eva was clearly alarmed. Her passion in life was travel and having a child and settling down in one place was worrying. Her freedom was taken by this child. Due to her heavy feelings of entrapment she did not bond with the baby. Throughout his childhood she is often frustrated and upset. She accuses the child of purposefully attacking her and making her life a misery. Franklin becomes worried that she is hallucinating because he only sees a fun loving, well behaved child. As a viewer you are allowed to see the twisted way the child, Kevin, plays his parents off against one another and terrorises his mother. The only time he seeks affection from her is when he is sick, but he quickly reverts back to his usual sadistic self.
Jumping forward a few years Eva falls pregnant again, this time her maternal instincts really kick in. Whether the first child was a shock, or she is finally ready or feels she wants to amend her first attempt at mother hood is unclear. What is very clear is the way she bonds with the second child immediately. Kevin now has a baby sister, Celia. Unfortunately, the family is a disaster waiting to happen and after a night out alone Franklin and Eva return to find Celia has had an accident which causes the loss of one eye. Eva blames Kevin, though Franklin's approach is based more on human error.
Throughout the stressful life Eva endures with Kevin she constantly tries to win his approval and affection, though she never succeeds. In one of her last memories she and the family leave for work and school. She remembers being sat at her desk when a college enters to break some bad news. There has been an incident at her sons school. Not knowing what to expect she attempts to get hold of Franklin and makes her way to the school. When she arrives the plays is a wash with sirens and people crying. She, like many of the other parents fears for her child and pushes toward the front of a crowd waiting to find out what has happened.
In a moment of disbelief Eva stands watching her son emerge from a sports centre with his hands raised. The police force him to the ground and he is apprehended. Smiling wryly at his mother as he is escorted off by the police another mother runs screaming as her daughter is wheeled out on an ambulance trolley. Many other children are brought out by the paramedics with arrows sticking out of them, gushing with blood and unable to stand.
Eva is shell shocked and returns home in a state of confusion. Once there she seeks out Franklin. She finds her husband and daughter in the back garden, both with arrows protruding from their cold wet torsos. I was shocked there was actual footage of the little girl lying dead in this film. Usually child deaths are covered and only suggested. The memory was dark and crushing. back in present time Eva visits Kevin in prison. She explains that he is nearly eighteen and therefore ready to be tried as an adult. He appears unphased. Before she leaves she asks the ever nagging question of why? He answers honestly remarking
"I used to think I knew. Now I'm not so sure."
At this point Eva hugs her son and he hugs her back. Once the credits began rolling I realised a lot of my questions had been answered. She stayed in town because she was close to Kevin. People blamed her simply because she was his mother, hence the unprovoked attack. She also blamed herself, hence the reason she didn't want the police involved. Most importantly she was still trying to achieve the love of her son and put right the bond between them. I believe in the end Kevin showed he had always loved her and he realised she loved him.
I came away from the film with a new batch of questions: why did Kevin not kill Eva?, Why did he kill Franklin, whom he seemed to favour as a child? Honestly, I hope these questions don't get answered as I believe everyone who views this film will have their own idea of how things were inside Kevin's head and how they would play out after his trial.
This film made my curl my toes in tension and wince away from the screen. Ezra Miller's portrayal of teenage Kevin reminded me of Richard Ramirez which added immensely to the eerie, evil teenager role. Overall I really rated this film as story and I loved the way it was shown. I urge you to make up your own mind and view this spine chilling tale of a mother and son's relationship.
I would like to read the novel now to see how the two compare. Possibly watch out for a review!
***** 5 Stars
Tilda Swinton's skeletal figure fits the role of worried mother Eva, who is plagued by the actions of her son. Although you do not find out until the end exactly what has happened you are shown glimpses of the past from Eva's broken memory. In the present Eva is very much alone, isolated and vulnerable.
The plot gets quickly dark as she is struggling to find a job, when, finally she is excepted somewhere her momentary happiness is interrupted by a stranger who attacks her. A man tries to help by offering to ring the police after the unprovoked attack but Eva insists it was her own fault. It was clear to me sitting in my comfortable cinema seat something terrible had taken place and she was at the centre of it all. It occurred to me then, why hasn't she left? If something so terrible had happened where she lived and there were obviously bad memories why did she stay? My question was answered quite a bit later in the film after her memories began to form a more complete story.
She had met Franklin (John C. Reily) and fallen in love, the two had married and soon she became pregnant. Despite Franklin being happy about the unborn child, Eva was clearly alarmed. Her passion in life was travel and having a child and settling down in one place was worrying. Her freedom was taken by this child. Due to her heavy feelings of entrapment she did not bond with the baby. Throughout his childhood she is often frustrated and upset. She accuses the child of purposefully attacking her and making her life a misery. Franklin becomes worried that she is hallucinating because he only sees a fun loving, well behaved child. As a viewer you are allowed to see the twisted way the child, Kevin, plays his parents off against one another and terrorises his mother. The only time he seeks affection from her is when he is sick, but he quickly reverts back to his usual sadistic self.
Jumping forward a few years Eva falls pregnant again, this time her maternal instincts really kick in. Whether the first child was a shock, or she is finally ready or feels she wants to amend her first attempt at mother hood is unclear. What is very clear is the way she bonds with the second child immediately. Kevin now has a baby sister, Celia. Unfortunately, the family is a disaster waiting to happen and after a night out alone Franklin and Eva return to find Celia has had an accident which causes the loss of one eye. Eva blames Kevin, though Franklin's approach is based more on human error.
Throughout the stressful life Eva endures with Kevin she constantly tries to win his approval and affection, though she never succeeds. In one of her last memories she and the family leave for work and school. She remembers being sat at her desk when a college enters to break some bad news. There has been an incident at her sons school. Not knowing what to expect she attempts to get hold of Franklin and makes her way to the school. When she arrives the plays is a wash with sirens and people crying. She, like many of the other parents fears for her child and pushes toward the front of a crowd waiting to find out what has happened.
In a moment of disbelief Eva stands watching her son emerge from a sports centre with his hands raised. The police force him to the ground and he is apprehended. Smiling wryly at his mother as he is escorted off by the police another mother runs screaming as her daughter is wheeled out on an ambulance trolley. Many other children are brought out by the paramedics with arrows sticking out of them, gushing with blood and unable to stand.
Eva is shell shocked and returns home in a state of confusion. Once there she seeks out Franklin. She finds her husband and daughter in the back garden, both with arrows protruding from their cold wet torsos. I was shocked there was actual footage of the little girl lying dead in this film. Usually child deaths are covered and only suggested. The memory was dark and crushing. back in present time Eva visits Kevin in prison. She explains that he is nearly eighteen and therefore ready to be tried as an adult. He appears unphased. Before she leaves she asks the ever nagging question of why? He answers honestly remarking
"I used to think I knew. Now I'm not so sure."
At this point Eva hugs her son and he hugs her back. Once the credits began rolling I realised a lot of my questions had been answered. She stayed in town because she was close to Kevin. People blamed her simply because she was his mother, hence the unprovoked attack. She also blamed herself, hence the reason she didn't want the police involved. Most importantly she was still trying to achieve the love of her son and put right the bond between them. I believe in the end Kevin showed he had always loved her and he realised she loved him.
I came away from the film with a new batch of questions: why did Kevin not kill Eva?, Why did he kill Franklin, whom he seemed to favour as a child? Honestly, I hope these questions don't get answered as I believe everyone who views this film will have their own idea of how things were inside Kevin's head and how they would play out after his trial.
This film made my curl my toes in tension and wince away from the screen. Ezra Miller's portrayal of teenage Kevin reminded me of Richard Ramirez which added immensely to the eerie, evil teenager role. Overall I really rated this film as story and I loved the way it was shown. I urge you to make up your own mind and view this spine chilling tale of a mother and son's relationship.
I would like to read the novel now to see how the two compare. Possibly watch out for a review!
***** 5 Stars
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)